THE CONCEPT OF TIME IN ORIGEN

PhD. Thesis – University of Glasgow, 1983–1987

 

Against all false accounts, both ancient and modern, this dissertation introduced for the first time the argument that Origen was an anti-Platonist in many respects and that he was the Greek illustrious philosopher and exegete of Plato, who turned a Christian anti-Platonist and ushered to the Creed of Nicaea. All allegations that Origen maintained doctrines such as ‘beginningless creation’, ‘pre-existence of souls’ [or of ‘intellects’], ‘transmigration of souls’, the Son being a ‘creature’, et cetera, have at last been demolished. Much later, a few scholars followed on my rebuttal of the notion of ‘pre-existence of souls’ allegedly maintained by Origen.

Besides, against all claims that Origen lacked an Eschatology and did not care for History, his Eschatology and Philosophy of History are expounded in detail.

 

 

 

 

 

THE CONCEPT OF TIME IN ORIGEN

PETER LANG, 1991

 

 

 

 

---

ORIGEN: COSMOLOGY AND ONTOLOGY OF TIME

SUPPLEMENTS TO VIGILIAE CHRISTIANAE

vol. 77

BRILL, 2006

This book reiterates and elaborates on Chapters 1-4 of my 1983-1987 doctoral thesis

 

Visit the official website of this book

 

https://brill.com/display/title/12088

 

 

 

 

 

---

ORIGEN: PHILOSOPHY OF HISTORY & ESCHATOLOGY

SUPPLEMENTS TO VIGILIAE CHRISTIANAE

vol. 85

BRILL, 2007

This book reiterates and elaborates on Chapter 5  of my 1983-1987 doctoral thesis. Two chapters have been added, retailing my Thesis. They comprise PART IV: Philosophy of History Resolved - A myth reconsidered: Chapter 10, pp. 357–380; "History Without a Body?". Chapter 11, pp. 381–434: "Is History a Parable?".

Several uninformed theologians (being in the dark, as they are on several other pertinent issues, too - let alone philosophy in general) reference the analyses of this book as if they first appeared in 2007.  They usually claim that I followed Mark Edwards’ 2002-book, which I never cited therein, and could not have cited during those earlier years, when Edwards’ book had not yet been written. In reality, however, my exposition harks back to my 1983-1987 Thesis, and its 1991-publication. And yet, this nescience persists, in the teeth of Mark Edwards himself having set the record straight a million times on that score.

 

Visit the official website of this book

 https://brill.com/display/title/12557

 

 

---

A NEWLY DISCOVERED GREEK FATHER

Cassian the Sabaite 
eclipsed by ‘John Cassian’ of Marseilles

A critical edition of an ancient manuscript 
with commentary and an English translation

from Codex 573, of the Meteora monastery of Metamorphosis (the Great Meteoron)

 

SUPPLEMENTS TO VIGILIAE CHRISTIANAE

vol. 111

BRILL, 2012

 

Visit the official website of this book

 

https://brill.com/display/title/21281

 

 

---

THE REAL CASSIAN REVISITED

Monastic Life, Greek Paideia, 
and Origenism in the Sixth Century

A critical study of an ancient manuscript

SUPPLEMENTS TO VIGILIAE CHRISTIANAE

vol. 112

BRILL, 2012

Visit the official website of this book

 

https://brill.com/display/title/17337?language=en

 

 

 

---

AN ANCIENT COMMENTARY ON THE BOOK OF REVELATION

A critical edition of the Scholia in Apocalypsin

with commentary and English translation

from Codex 573, of the Meteora monastery of Metamorphosis (the Great Meteoron)

 

Cambridge University Press, 2013

 

Visit the official website of this book

 

https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/an-ancient-commentary-on-the-book-of-revelation/8BE881A81D038A8C9519E7D46ECEB363

 

This book, written by the newly discovered Greek father Cassian the Sabaite (c. 470 - 20 July, 548 – an acclaimed scholar, the fourth abbot of the Laura of Sabas in Plalestine after St Sabas, and a spiritual child of St Sabas himself), alongside my two 2012-books, caused panic-stricken delirium to certain Catholic theologians, monks, priests, and the like, prompting frantic and preposterous reviews in a desperate attempt to rescue the mirage called ‘John Cassian of Marseilles’.

 Cassian’s Greek texts always indicate as their author ‘Cassian’, never ‘John Cassian’, which is a name entirely unknown to any Greek theologian, or to any Greek source whatsoever.

Cyril of Scythopolis praised not only Abba Cassian the Sabaite's orthodoxy and pious conduct, but also his erudition (τὸν νῦν ἡγούμενον ἀββᾶν Κασιανὸν Σκυθοπολίτην ὄντα τῷ γένει ὀρθόδοξόν τε ὄντα καὶ βίῳ καὶ λόγῳ κεκοσμημένον), which squares with the report that Abba Cassian the Sabaite was a proficient theologian, who took part in the Council of 536, as a delegate of the Laura of Sabas.

 

Cassian was a native of Scythopolis (today’s Beit She'an or Beisan or Beth-shean, a city in the Northern District of Israel), who had never anything to do with Marseilles, the once-Greek colony in France.

 The fancy ‘John Cassian’ was made a native of Scythia Minor (now Dobruja, a region today shared by Romania and Bulgaria).

The edited texts presented, edited and exhaustively perused in three books, reveal a profoundly erudite Greek author,employing highly refined and extremely rare Greek idiomatic expressions that had been used by a small handful of Greek philosophers of the highest order. And yet fanatic Catholic zealots desperately strove either to turn a blind eye on those illuminating analyses (assuming they were able to read them in the first place) and preposterously asserts that these manifestly Greek originals are but Greek translations from clumsy Latin propositions.

Thus, they frantically dismissed Cassian the Sabaite altogether, while dreading (or mourning) the prospect of 'eighty years of scholarship on John Cassian' turning to a demolished house of cards.

But I have left the ravings of fanatics to their own devises.

While despising conversation with bigotry, and abiding by unbiased non-partisan scholarship only, I wrote the Appendix II: “Cassian who? On Attempts to Rescue a Figment” (available below), in my Origen and Hellenism, pp. 475–496. This demonstrably kept at bay any sort of religious partisanship (to which I have always been utterly indifferent) or any sort of chauvinism (as a consternated critic nesciently alleged), with which I have never had anything to do, anyway.

For I am myself too Hellene to be a chauvinist  – and let discomposed bigotry remain in its dire straits.

The problem perenially remains the same: frivolous persons of questionable acumen, posing as 'scholars', presume to make assertions on texts of Greek literature, both philosophical and patristic (especially ones loaded with highly nuanced philosophical connotations and stupendously telling idiomatic Greek expressions meaningfully pregnant with precious information and speaking to brilliant moments of the Greek philosophical tradition), while they themselves refuse to learn Greek.

 

 

---

 

ANAXAGORAS, ORIGEN, AND NEOPLATONISM

The Legacy of Anaxagoras to Classical and Late Antiquity

2 volumes
pp. xxviii + 1794

De Gruyter
Berlin / New York, 2016

vol. I
(pp. xxviii + 1 ÷ 823)

vol. II
pp. (xix + 825 ÷ 1778)

Origen caveated that his doctrine of the soul had nothing to to with that of Plato’s, and that his own ‘theory’ was ‘more sublime’ (ὑψηλοτέρα θεωρία – Contra Celsum, IV.19). However, both ancient and modern unschooled theologians, unable as they have always been to make out what this ‘more sublime theory’ was about, are locked up in the folly that Origen maintained ‘a pre-existent world of souls’ and a 'beginningless creation'.

Having already rebutted these allegations since 1983-1987, in my Doctoral Thesis (published in 1991), this book explains what this ‘more sublime theory’ was about, namely, that this was Origen’s Anaxagorean Theory of Logoi, which I expound at length and discuss in its proper context within the Greek philosophical ambiance.

Theologians, unable as they always are to follow Origen's enormous philosophical background, and consequently intransigent opposite elaborate arguments for that matter (which are way unable to assess, and, more often than not, even to read) obstreperously are stuck to the folly about ‘a pre-existent world of souls’, and the like.

By now, only a few philosophers, and far fewer theologians, have begun to grasp what Origen's Theory of Logoi actually is about.

 

Visit the official website of this book

 

https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110420104/html

 

 

---

ORIGEN: NEW FRAGMENTS FROM THE COMMENTARY ON MATTHEW

Codices Sabaiticus 232 & Holy Cross 104, Jerusalem

pp. cxcv + 686

Ferdinand Schöningh (Paderborn, Germany / Boston, USA), 2020

 

Visit the official website of this book

 

https://brill.com/display/title/56573

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

ORIGEN AND HELLENISM

The Interplay between Greek and Christian Ideas in Late Antiquity

pp. xxiv + 569 

Peter Lang, New York,

 

---

 

  

GUILTY OF GENIUS

Origen and the Theory of Transmigration 

pp. xxvii + 454

Peter Lang, New York,

---

 

THE WISDOM OF SOLOMON AND THE BYZANTINE RECEPTION OF ORIGEN

pp. xvi+720

Peter Lang, New York,

 

https://www.peterlang.com/document/1267466

 

This volume offers a critical edition, with English translation and extensive annotation, of a previously unknown Greek manuscript.

The authorof the manuscript writes in header, “Ἑρμηνεία τῆς Σοφίας τοῦ Σολομῶντος, ὥς φασιν, παρὰ τοῦ ’Ὠριγένους ἑρμηνευθεῖσα (‘Exegesis of the Wisdom of Solomon, which, as they say, has been interpreted by Origen’).”

However, it turned out that this text is not actually Origen’s. It was written by the immensely erudite Byzantine Greek astronomer, historian, and theologian Nikephorus Gregoras (c. 1295 – 1360), who used Origen’s name for specific reasons explained in this edition. It is neverthelessarguably demonstrated that Nikephorus Gregoras availed himself of Origen's own Commentary on the Wisdom of Solomon.

---

 

 

 

 

DAEMONS IN HELLENIC AND CHRISTIAN ANTIQUITY

Porphyry’s Discipleship with Origen

Peter Lang, 2025

New York - Berlin - Bruxelles - Chennai - Lausanne – Oxford

pp. xxii + 790

 

Visit the official website of this book

https://www.peterlang.com/document/1336022

 

 

 

 

---